🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he endured losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when issued by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Order: Executives Above Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss them for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.